View Idea
9
Promote
I like it!
Panel on Food Companies Reducing Carbon Emissions Via Their Food Practices
D127  Category: Fortune BrainStorm Green 2010    Status: Under Review
Tags:


A widely cited 2006 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Livestock's Long Shadow, estimates that 18 percent of annual worldwide GHG emissions are attributable to cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, camels, pigs, and poultry. But recent analysis by Goodland and Anhang finds that livestock and their byproducts actually account for at least 32.6 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year, or 51 percent of annual worldwide GHG emissions.
The free article is here: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294

 

I suggest that there be a panel on food companies reducing carbon emissions via their food practices.


One speaker should be:

Fedele Bauccio, Winner of the 2009 NRDC Growing Green Award and CEO of Bon Appétit, an onsite restaurant company providing café and catering services to corporations, colleges and universities and specialty venues in 29 states, has been a pioneer in recognizing and addressing the connection between food and climate change through its Low Carbon Diet initiative, which is on track to reduce its associated carbon emissions by 25 percent from 2007-2010.

Sweden is now labeling food products with carbon emissions via this NY Times Article. It would be good to have a representative from this initiative. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/world/europe/23degrees.html

 

btw, I'm moderating an Organic Agriculture panel at the Net Impact Cornell Conference On Friday where I'll be discussing this Food-Carbon Relationship and actions to be taken.

 

Thanks,

Mary Vincent

 


 

4 Comments

Commenter Photo
Profile Icon Tech 2000 Nov 13 2009
Not only are you correct in the importance of the mass amount of carbon emissions being attributed to the cattle, sheep, goats, camels, pigs, and poultry but it this industry is responsible for a heck of lot of fuel usage. Just the drying of corn that is harvested out of the fields consumes mega amount of energy and the corn is dried with dryers using electic or gas. Here in Iowa at this time of the year you can hear dryers being rung 24 hours a day. And it is interesting that for every pound of meat produced it takes 5 pounds of grain or corn. There is something terribly out of balance here. Thanks for the link http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294 I opened it and saved and plan to read tomorrow. Tech 2000
Commenter Photo
Profile Icon Mary Vincent Nov 29 2009
Thanks Tech 2000 for your comment.
Here's a new Lancet research study by an international collaboration of scientists: "Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture".
The full text is here: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2809%2961753-0/fulltext
The Paper suggests that in order for the agricultural sector to meet the target recommended by the UK Committee on Climate Change to reduce UK emissions from the concentrations recorded in 1990 by 80% by 2050, which would require a 50% reduction by 2030, they identified that a 30% reduction in livestock production would be needed to meet this target. In addition, the potential benefits of reduced consumption of livestock products on the burden of ischaemic heart disease shows the disease burden would decrease by about 15% in the UK."
Commenter Photo
Profile Icon mslupe Dec 27 2009
i think there should be tax incentives for companies who do not transport food long distances. also incentives for small sustainable farms. in the olden days farmers used manure. but more sustainable ag practices should be encourages. raising goats pigs llamas chickens near the user market. more organic practices. elimination of the overprocessing of food. cutting down transportation of food. using better sustainable gardening practices. eliminating the use of chemical fertilizers, and dna wierd hybrids...less corn. using more native plants. more mediterranean practices. planting basil and tomato plants. encouraging small farms. and the use of quality farming practices. cutting down the costly transport of food long distances. soo foolish as food degrades when it is transported.
Commenter Photo
Profile Icon Geoscann Mar 25 2010
Creative brainstorming!HARMONIZER!
This submission was promoted by the following people:
Profile Icon Mary Vincent   Nov 11 2009
Profile Icon Tech 2000   Nov 13 2009
Profile Icon ShirleyLin   Nov 16 2009

 

Or Login with another account.
     
Minimize/Maximize
Share with others
Bookmark and Share

Terms and Conditions  |  Contact us: ptran@brightidea.com
poweredbywebstorm

2.39726 seconds